Powered By Blogger

Tuesday, 12 April 2016

[COSATU Press] The unprincipled and unaccountable banks have no moral authority to moralise on the Gupta issue

cid:image001.jpg@01D1545E.EEB01070

The unprincipled and unaccountable banks have no moral authority to moralise on the Gupta issue

The Congress of South African Trade Unions has noted with the concern and contempt the decision by some South African banks to hypocritically and recklessly ostracise the Gupta businesses, for narrow political ends. The decision by ABSA, FNB, NEDBANK, SASFIN and KPMG to stop doing business and associating with the Guptas is nothing but political posturing. This decision will not only negatively affect the gluttonous Guptas, but will badly affect the innocent workers, who have no dog in that hunt.

COSATU demands answers from these banks; they need to explain why they decided to took these decisions, when workers are facing such a bleak future. Even the discredited and politically toxic people like the Guptas deserve to only be found guilty after a proper due process has been followed and they have never been convicted in a court of law. The federation has demanded a meeting with the Guptas to discuss the pending job losses in their companies after this decision by the banks.

To prove that they lack any developmental consciousness, they did not think about the implications that their public relations stunt was going to have on the workers. The country is shedding jobs at an alarming rate and some of these banks are actually retrenching workers ,but they saw it necessary to ostracise the Gupta owned companies that employ thousands of innocent workers.

COSATU feels that when worker’s jobs are at stake, it was inane and thoughtless of these organisations to play politics with their livelihoods. OAKBAY, Sahara Holdings and TNA might belong to the unsavoury family like the Guptas, but they employ thousands of innocent workers. Thousands of families and their livelihoods are being sacrificed by unprincipled financial institutions to pursue their own narrow agenda. Workers are a primary stakeholders in any company and to ignore their interests exposes these financial institutions for what they are, unprincipled opportunists.

The federation holds no candle for the exploitative Guptas, who are terrible employers and have proven themselves to have no principles or self restraint. But the federation denounces the self serving and hypocritical stance of these banks and financial institutions. They acted without thinking about the fate of thousands of workers employed by the Guptas, and only treated this as a public relations issue. We challenge them to be transparent and prove that they and their shareholders are not doing business with any politically exposed individuals, corporations of regimes.

COSATU is angry that innocent workers find themselves as part of collateral damage in an unprincipled fight between two sections of corporate looters, who are fighting for a sit at the table. These banks do not represent anyone ,except their shareholders, some of whom are foreign financial institutions with a reputation of doing business with unsavoury characters and regimes around the world.

Banks like ABSA have a lot to answer for and they have no right to be preaching to anyone. These institutions are products of an evil apartheid system that was declared a crime against humanity by the United Nations. They have never explained or apologised for their role in propping up and doing business with that regime. They have no moral authority and no right to pontificate about political exposure, while recklessly putting at risk the livelihoods of so many innocent workers.

These are organisations, which call for the de-regulation of labour markets, and advocate for the de-regulation of financial markets in order that they can maximise their profits. This new disdain for blackmoney and patriotic fervour that has suddenly engulfed them is selective and self serving. They have colluded to fix prices and impose high charges on their customers, making it very difficult for the majority to save. They have ostracised the mostly black working class by denying them access to finance and ultimately stopping their participation in the economy.

When it suits them these banks and their rapacious shareholders never forget to tell the workers that money has no motherland; and that their loyalty is to their shareholders. They are daily taking decisions that do not serve the interest of the country and their sudden patriotic fervour can only fool the uninitiated.

While the insatiable Guptas need to be called out for trying to capture the state in order to continue their corrupt accumulation, this does not give monopoly capital the right to moralise.  The people of South Africa will fix what is wrong with their government and with their country and do not need unaccountable and guiltless banks and financial institutions to interfere in the political affairs of this country.


Issued by COSATU

Sizwe Pamla (National Spokesperson)
Congress of South African Trade Unions
110 Jorissen Cnr Simmonds Street
Braamfontein
2017

P.O.Box 1019
Johannesburg
2000
South Africa

Tel: +27 11 339-4911 Direct 010 219-1339
Mobile: 060 975 6794

SACP statement on banking and auditing oligopolies and private monopoly - the accomplices of the Guptas‎

South African Communist Party
Press Alert, 11 April 2016
SACP statement on banking and auditing oligopolies and private monopoly - the accomplices of the Guptas

The SACP has noted decisions taken by a number of financial oligopolies constituting private monopoly in the banking and auditing segments of the fincial sector, among others ABSA, FirstRand and the imperialist auditing monopoly GPMG to severe ties with businesses owned by, or linked to the Gupta family that is entangled in allegations of corporate state capture.

The SACP has been in the forefront of the campaign to achieve transformation of the financial sector. The sector is dominated by handful oligopolies ABSA, FirstRand, Standard Bank, Nedbank and some insignificant new arrivals, all together forming private monopoly and pose a threat of collusive market conduct. 

Acting together with an imperialist monopoly KPMG, the private banking monopoly has shown its dangers and collusive market conduct against one of their private mould, the Gupta oligarchy, with which they have established long standing business relations. What did they see all along in their relationship with the Guptas that they concealed until pressure from the struggle against corporate capture, thus acting as accomplices of the Guptas? They are as guilty, and cannot be left unchallenged. The majority of them benefited from apartheid - which was declared by the United Nations as a crime against humanity. They continue to benefit from financially exploiting our people.

The SACP reiterates the importance of developing public ownership and democratic control, but which which is free from corporate capture and manipulation by private capital capital accumulation interests not only in the banking sector but the financial sector as a whole. The importance of state, co-operative and worker owned banks and other financial establishments trading in financial services cannot be over-emphasised. The dangers demonstrated by private oligopolies and monopoly are clearly pronounced for all to see. 

The SACP stands on the side of the workers, and will fight for their rights and livelihoods - as opposed to the greedy behaviour of their exploiters the Guptas included.

Issued by the SACP

--
__________________________________________
FOR GENERAL ENQUIRIES ON SACP STATEMENTS

CONTACT:

ALEX MOHUBETSWANE MASHILO: NATIONAL SPOKESPERSON, HEAD OF COMMUNICATIONS
SKYPE: MASHILOAM
MOBILE: 082 9200 308
OFFICE: 011 339 3621/2
TWITTER: SACP1921
WEBSITE: WWW.SACP.ORG.ZA
FACEBOOK PAGE: SOUTH AFRICAN COMMUNIST PARTY
SACP USTREAM TV CHANNEL: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/sacp-tv

[SACP] The Press Ombudsman and Panel of Adjudicators direct the Rapport newspaper to apologise to Nzimande

South African Communist Party
Press statement, 12 April 2016

The Press Ombudsman and Panel of Adjudicators direct the Rapport newspaper to apologise to Nzimande

The South African Communist Party (SACP) welcomes the ruling by the Press Ombudsman and Panel of Adjudicators directing the Rapport newspaper to apologise to the Minister of Higher Education and Training (HET), our General Secretary Comrade Blade Nzimande and other persons for creating wrong impressions the newspaper published about them, adversely affecting their reputations. The SACP condemns in the strongest terms possible all fabrications of lies pushed and carried by newspapers such as the Rapport against the Party, its leaders and members in any of their capacities or any South African for that matter.

On 31 March the Press Ombudsman and Panel of Adjudicators found that Naspers’ Media24 title the Rapport newspaper created the unfair impression that the HET Minister Dr Blade Nzimande was in some way conflicted and that the newspaper adversely affected his reputation as well as that of the other persons impacted negatively by the story including Sector Education and Training Authorities (Setas).

The Rapport newspaper published the lies to create the impression that the Minister (and also the SACP – i.e. in other stories it has published) were reaping money from Setas. The newspaper committed the violation of the Press Code in the story it first published 8 November 2015 under the headline: “Seta-miljoene is na Blade se trust – Verwaarloosde hoenders is ál teken van lewe (Seta millions went to Blade’s trust – Neglected chickens the only sign of life). The story was also carried by Naspers’ Media24 online news publication News24 under the headline: “Nzimande’s trust reaps R11m in funding from education organization. The story propagated the lies as captured in the headlines, despite the wealth of correct information it has been supplied and had in its possession. Nzimande dismissed the lies with contempt and condemned in the strongest terms possible the Rapport’s conduct.

In their finding, the Press Ombudsman and Panel of Adjudicators state in no uncertain terms, that:

“The problem we [The Press Ombudsman and the Panel of Adjudicators] have with the headline is not the statement that the trust was Nzimande’s [which is a lie] (because he founded it and still was its patron), but rather that it enhanced the impression of a conflict of interest.

“We [The Press Ombudsman and Panel of Adjudicators] have little doubt that this has unnecessarily and unfairly done damage to Nzimande’s reputation.

“Section 4.7 of the Press Code is relevant in this regard. It reads:

“The press shall exercise care and consideration in matters involving…reputation. The dignity or reputation of an individual should be overridden only by a legitimate public interest and in the following circumstances:
4.7.1 The facts reported are true or substantially true; or
4.7.2 The article amounts to fair comment based on facts that are adequately referred to and that are true or substantially true; or
4.7.3 The report amounts to a fair and accurate report of court proceedings, Parliamentary proceedings or the proceedings of any quasi-judicial tribunal or forum; or
4.7.4 It was reasonable for the article to be published because it was prepared in accordance with acceptable principles of journalistic conduct and in the public interest.

None of these provisions was applicable in this case”, said the Press Ombudsman and Panel of Adjudicators about the violation committed by Naspers’ Media24 publications the Rapport newspaper and its accomplice News24. In their findings – “Minister of Higher Education and Training et al vs. Rapport” – the Press Ombudsman and Panel of Adjudicators conclude that:

“The headline, together with some elements of the article as discussed above [i.e. in their findings], created the unfair impression that Nzimande was in some way conflicted, adversely affecting his reputation, as well as those of Damcom and the two Setas”. The Press Ombudsman and the Panel of Adjudicators concludes that: “This is in breach of the following sections of the Press Code: 1.1: “The press shall take care to report news…fairly”; and 4.7: “The press shall exercise care and consideration in matters involving…reputation.”

The Press Ombudsman and Panel of Adjudicators categorised the breach as serious.

The Rapport newspaper was ordered to apologise to Dr Nzimande and the other whose reputation it violated by its breach of the principles of ethical news reporting prescribed in the Press Code. The Press Ombudsman and Panel of Adjudicators directed that the headline of the apology:  “should reflect the content of the text. A heading such as Matter of Fact, or something similar, is not acceptable. If the offending article appeared on Rapport’s website, the apology should appear there as well.”

Napers through its Media24 is engaged in wider political agenda to tarnish the reputation of the SACP and its leaders

The Rapport story was not an accident but part of a wider strategy.

Naspers’ Media24, through several of its titles and online news outlet News24 has been pushing a negatively charged, politically motivated coverage agenda to tarnish the reputation of SACP General Secretary Comrade Blade Nzimande and other senior leaders of the Party. This Media24 news coverage agenda emerged in the aftermath of the SACP initiated campaign to achieve transformation of the media. The campaign seeks to achieve de-monopolisation. It has as its main, but not exclusive, focus on the monopoly or dominance Naspers has established among others through its Media24 oligopoly and pay TV monopoly Multichoice. The other objects of the campaign are to achieve diversity of ownership and perspective, robustly independent accountability and decent work for all media workers.   

The SACP has strongly come out and campaigned against the problematic relationship established between Naspers’ Multichoice and the SABC. The relationship has effectively given Multichoice enormous influence or control over the SABC, our public broadcaster. In what amounts to collusion, the SABC’s rights for example to have the words “twenty four” or numbers “24” in the name of its 24-hour news channel were handed over to Naspers’ Multichoice in a wider package that works well for Multichoice’s capital accumulation interests compared to the SABC. The handing over of the heritage of SABC archives to Multichoice and control by Multichoice over how they must be used as opposed to independent public programming by the SABC are part of the problematic relationship.

It is among others because of the wider manoeuvres of corporate capture in the communications industry including the monopoly interests of Naspers’ Multichoice that the analogue to digital television broadcast migration process has been delayed. In addition, the monopoly is almost completely left untouched instead of using the process to de-monopolise the industry. As a result, new entrants will find it prohibitive to gain access to broadcasting and content protection.

The SACP has been fighting against all of these and other harmful structural and behavioural agendas. The SACP will not be deterred by Naspers’ shenanigans. The Party will continue fighting, and intensifying the struggle to achieve media transformation. This includes taking Naspers’ unethical news reporting head on!!

Issued by the SACP





-- 
__________________________________________
FOR GENERAL ENQUIRIES ON SACP STATEMENTS 
 
CONTACT:
 
ALEX MOHUBETSWANE MASHILO: NATIONAL SPOKESPERSON, HEAD OF COMMUNICATIONS
SKYPE: MASHILOAM
MOBILE: 082 9200 308
OFFICE: 011 339 3621/2
TWITTER: SACP1921
WEBSITE: WWW.SACP.ORG.ZA
FACEBOOK PAGE: SOUTH AFRICAN COMMUNIST PARTY
SACP USTREAM TV CHANNEL: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/sacp-tv